<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Artist&#8217;s statment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whalecrow.co.uk/whalec/2008/02/19/artists-statment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whalecrow.co.uk/whalec/2008/02/19/artists-statment/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 02:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.whalecrow.co.uk/whalec/2008/02/19/artists-statment/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whalecrow.co.uk/whalec/2008/02/19/artists-statment/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>If you're thinking about using these artists statements for applications, then you'll hsve to shorten it.  it depends on the place but most people want statements to be no more than 2-3 paras.  in other words, nice, short and concise.

And equally (i feel a philosophical ramble coming on here) regarding you hoping they improve over time.  well i have to say, this remark depends on how you look at it, personally i feel at the min that, due to the cyclic course of the cosmos, one could argue that we never improve as such but merely come from a different point in time and space.  think i need a turd now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re thinking about using these artists statements for applications, then you&#8217;ll hsve to shorten it.  it depends on the place but most people want statements to be no more than 2-3 paras.  in other words, nice, short and concise.</p>
<p>And equally (i feel a philosophical ramble coming on here) regarding you hoping they improve over time.  well i have to say, this remark depends on how you look at it, personally i feel at the min that, due to the cyclic course of the cosmos, one could argue that we never improve as such but merely come from a different point in time and space.  think i need a turd now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

